

View extensions for UIImageView, NSImageView, NSButton and UIButton to directly set an image from a URL.Prefetching images and showing them from the cache to boost your app.Use the downloader, caching system, and image processors separately as you need. Cancelable downloading and auto-reusing previous downloaded content to improve performance.Customizable expiration date and size limit. Multiple-layer hybrid cache for both memory and disk.Useful image processors and filters provided.Loading image from either URLSession-based networking or local provided data.Asynchronous image downloading and caching.It provides you a chance to use a pure-Swift way to work with remote images in your next app. No additional synchronization is required, because the target machine X86 has a strong memory model and therefore satisfies acquire/release pattern on every load and store access.Kingfisher is a powerful, pure-Swift library for downloading and caching images from the web. Thus volatile provides the necessary compiler aided guarantees in VC10 and no optimization is allowed make any reordering that violates the acquire/release semantics. "A read of a volatile object (volatile read) has Acquire semantics a reference to a global or static object that occurs after a read of volatile memory in the instruction sequence will occur after that volatile read in the compiled binary." "A write to a volatile object (volatile write) has Release semantics a reference to a global or static object that occurs before a write to a volatile object in the instruction sequence will occur before that volatile write in the compiled To implement acquire/release semantics, all I need to do is to make use of Microsoft specific volatile extension - according to the documentation: I would like to know weather there is a flow in the following The problematic cases are relaxed operations and fences. This library is a mapping from C++11's memory model to VC10's (run on X86).īefore doing any benchmarks, I must be ensured that the implementation is correct, but still after reading documentation on MSDN I have doubts. I decided to add atomics support (most often used subset of it) through header-only library approach to VC10. In contrast to the upcoming Visual C++ 11, there is no support for C++11-atomics in Visual C++ 10 - and looks like no will be added soon.
